Monday, May 25, 2015
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
As far as television is concerned, the rape scene where Ramsey Bolton rapes Sansa Stark while forcing Theon Greyjoy/Reek to watch ranks as the most disturbing scene I’ve seen on a screen in a very long time. I’ve read the books so the scenes that included Ned Stark’s head being sliced and the Red Wedding were not anywhere close to shocking. This….this was a fear that started welling up last week with the marriage proposal and slowly became a nightmare with the actual nuptials being performed in Winterfell. I was so hoping that Sansa was not going to be the victim of Bolton’s sadism while at the same time knowing that in this world a newly married women, whether she liked it or not, was going to be used on her wedding night. It was profoundly distressing.
It also created a huge reaction on the Interwebs, including some tweets by a Senator.
The Missouri Senator gets kudos for watching Game of Thrones but to call the scene “gratuitous” destroys a whole lot of credibility on whether or not she’s a regular. The series is a pantheon of sex and violence that matches George R.R. Martins books fairly well. But the question should not be whether or not sex and extreme violence should exist in fictional stories. Such things have existed in great literary works for centuries. The questions should be much more nuanced.
Does the rape scene represent the book?
While Sansa Stark is not raped in the book, the character of Jeyne Poole is on her wedding night with…..Ramsey Bolton. And the scene is far worse.
Should be television viewer have expected this?
Ramsey Bolton is a disgusting individual that is the closest thing to an absolute sadist that exists in the serious. The producers of Game of Thrones set up the wedding scene when Sansa and Littlefinger were overlooking Moat Cailin, and Sansa was debting on whether or not to proceed to Winterfell. Viewers had to have been screaming the TV for Sansa not to go because Ramsey was going to do something horrid. It was a guarantee.
Does the scene advance the characters or the story?
In the scene Ramsey may have sealed his own fate as when he commits the rape. If Sansa doesn’t kill him then Reek will; don’t forget that during the scene the camera focuses on Greyjoy as tears stream down his face. And Sansa has been vacillating back and forth over being a real player in the Game or a scared doe who is simply the victim of numerous instances she can’t control. Sansa knew this was going to happen the moment she accepted the marriage. Her overthrow of Ramsey didn’t begin with the rape, it began before that, probably solidified by the dinner scene in the last episode. The rape magnified the idea that Sansa was no longer the victim. She’s accepting the situation because it’s going to lead to a larger goal. Sound crazy? Then you haven’t been really watching Game of Thrones.
Game of Thrones is not anti-woman, nor is it a television show that uses sex as a cheap shot at getting viewers. Lest we forget this…
Remember that debate? Not too long ago the series was lauded for its powerful female characters and edgy political play where the ladies often had ultimate power while the men played with swords and lost body parts. Now that some of those women are weaker (often because of other women) the outrage begins that male producers are picking on females and portraying them as victims. It goes both ways, people. People seem to forget that Theon Greyjoy had a season, an entire season, where his only scenes were those in which Ramsey Bolton tortured him, including horrific mutilation and sexual abuse. Not much of a peep was said there.
It is a fictional series by-the-way. The sensationalism of sex and violence is plenty over-the-top but in a way that expands and provides depth to the story. And the television version of the story avoids the morass that the books have become; devoid of the constant carousel of characters on questionable quests don’t ever seem to acquire resolution. Yes, the Sansa’s rape scene was awful to watch and I would rather have not seen it. But he politicizing, the phony indignation, and arrogance of claiming the moral high ground is nearly as disturbing as the scene.
I wish I could turn THAT off instead.
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Advanced Placement tests are done. Classes are being scheduled for next year. Senior farewells have started. The College Board is reminding me of summer fun in Salt Lake City.
We aren’t even close to over.
The kids seemed pretty confident in the Comp Gov AP test, pretty much saying that the questions were either really easy or insanely hard. When asked about comparisons to the APUSH test the students were fairly split about which one was tougher.
I’m sure the College Board knows at this point that the FRQ and DBQ questions are only a hashtag away. Want some sick humor? Check out APUSH and AP Comp Gov hashtags on Twitter around the time tests are getting out. The memes are often hilarious and rather politically incorrect. They are also very informative about not only what was on the test but also what was not taught by the teacher of the tweeter. Seriously, some kids didn’t even know the AP 6 in Comp Gov, and that’s unforgivable.
So what’s next for Seniors? Well here is the yearly struggle of the message we give to the Senior class. Next week is the wonderful new distraction called Senior Week. Then a bunch of Seniors are on the Senior Trip to Mickey’s Corporate Kingdom where the will miss the following Tuesday and Wednesday, and then that Friday is Senior ditch day. But somewhere we keep getting the message that we need to teach to the end, especially for those that, you know, are borderline in making the end.
Graduation is the event that matters. I never understood the idea of a Senior trip existing over multiple school days. It sends a really screwy message.
What do we do after AP testing? Well, we work. I tell my Seniors that I recognize that they put forth a whole lot of out of class effort and it is time to pull back on the homebound workload.
But they need to be in class. My International Relations simulation is engagement intensive and requires attendance to be mandatory or grades start suffering. My last few weeks are a great way to help boost the grade of those that struggled with my AP intensity while enjoying a simulation that can be really involved. Nope, there’s work yet to be done.
The second basketball season begins this week. Yep, Summer AAU is upon us where June and most of July is going to be taken up by lots and lots of basketball. Gone are the days where you go to a couple of tournaments and that’s it. Now Varsity programs are a year round function that compete with local AAU programs. Those programs charge $500-$1,000 for less than 20 games. We charge less $300 for 50 games, and we help out kids that need financial assistance. Thankfully I have a staff that is amazing and takes on this summertime commitment because I need the vacation with my wife to recharge.
A student walks into Open Gym and I look at his feet. He has low top shoes on that look half trail shoe and half bowling shoe.
“Sorry D, can’t let you run today in those shoes. Gotta have basketball shoes in Open Gym.”
You know that moment when about twenty guys in a gym stop what they are doing and look you. Yeah, that happened.
“Brown, those are the new Durants.”
“Those are the new KDs, Brown!”
“Brown, those are basketball shoes. They’re Durants!”
I looked at a colleague who just shook his head and said, “Kids just don’t wear highs anymore.”
Highs? Hell, kids don’t even wear real kicks anymore.
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Something tells me that a nude human Supply and Demand curve might be a tad bit unpopular in the American public high school system. I wonder about college.
“Over the last 11 years, professor Ricardo Dominguez has taught a course at UC San Diego titled Visual Arts 104A: Performing the Self.
As part of an assignment, students are asked to make a nude “gesture” in front of the class in a darkened room.”
Yes, um, Coach Brown from the Ukiah Daily Fishwrap….I was just wondering….in a class called “Visual Arts: Performing the Self”, with a professor that is known to enjoy being naked, and with your daughter being told that nudity might actually happen in the class……
WHY ARE YOU TELLING THE MEDIA ABOUT A CLASS THAT YOUR COLLEGE AGE DAUGHTER IS ATTENDING???
“It bothers me; I'm not sending her to school for this,” the anonymous woman told KGTV. “It makes me sick to my stomach.”
Not that I would know but it’s a good bet that there are other things that might be cause for concern at U.C. San Deigo that does not involve a nude people in a room painting each other. It’s college for Christ sake; the act of getting naked for some Art class is not necessarily a brand new concept, especially in the University of California system. I read the story and noticed two things; an overbearing parent, and …
Mr. Dominguez seems nice but I’m not getting in a room naked with him.
“The students can choose to do the nude gesture version or the naked version (the naked gesture means you must perform a laying bare of your 'traumatic' self, and students can do this gesture under a rug or in any way they choose -- but they must share their most fragile self -- something most students find extremely hard to do). The nude self gesture takes place in complete darkness, and everyone is nude, with only one candle or very small source of light for each individual performance.”
Fine. It’s art. So is this.
Guess to each their own. I wouldn’t get all nude with a professor and a candle lit room, nor would I get Abramovic slap happy to find an emotional connection to pain-driven art. However the parent is the one that is out of line here. College is meant for the bizarre to be explored and the boundaries to be pushed. It’s also one of those things you let your kid experience even if the parent is paying the rent. If the kid has the grades and drive, then the nude painting is just another stop on the journey of self-actualization.
She’s in college. Let her figure it out.
Monday, May 11, 2015
In all likelihood competitive cheerleading will become a sport sanctioned by the California Interscholastic Federation in 2017. There is probably a joke somewhere in there about cheerleading and the word “sport” but you won’t hear it from me. Good cheerleading requires practice, skill, commitment, collaboration, and some serious strength and flexibility. Those that don’t think it can be competitive haven’t seen good cheerleading.
Still, while State Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez might have thought she was doing a favor writing a bill making it a state sanctioned sport, what she really has done is welcome the sport to the CIF, Section, and school bureaucracy that now makes up the massive school-athletic structure. Now coaches get to pay hundreds of dollars to sit through online classes, pass numerous security checks, and go through the district funding obligations to access money they might have raised but is no longer their own to play with. Congratulations.
Next season, El Diamante eight-year cheer advisor Amanda Richards, who also teaches physical education, is partnering with a new company to make the uniforms more affordable at $250.
Richards used to take her squads to competitions, but to cut back on expenses, they stopped going about seven years ago. It cost an additional $500 to $600 for each cheerleader to attend competitions.
Richards estimates that it can cost anywhere between $800 to $1,400 to be a cheerleader per school year.
"The burden is on athletics because we get no funds to run the program from the district," Flenory said. "So we have to absorb it. If a girl goes out for cheer and she can't go out to buy a uniform, I have to go out and find the money to buy the uniform."
But if AB 949 passes, that responsibility falls on the shoulders of the school district the Miner athletic director noted, which is why he supports the proposal.
"Once it becomes a certified sport, there has to be some type of money for it," Flenory said.
Oh sure there does!
Saturday, May 09, 2015
This is the week that you might actually be able to hear the stress emit from student brains. Advanced Placement testing started on Monday and while I try and try to calm them down, many act as if the test will bring ultimate fulfillment or total despair to their lives.
My AP (Comparative Government) will be this coming Thursday. The benefit is the extra time during this AP week, especially since the elementary teachers voted to make the high school loose one week of instruction. But the bad part to the week is that about 70% of the students are not in class because they are taking other AP tests, and many are fairly burnt out by the time mine rolls along. That just makes engagement that much more necessary this week!
From all accounts Prom was quite the success. There were the usual student complaints that you always hear from Prom that revolve around the music or the drama but the busses didn’t seem to be much of an issue and the vast majority of students said they enjoyed it. At the same time it looks like the bussing also curtailed a lot of the drinking as many supervisors said it was a slow night for boozy students. Good. We like students having a good time in a safe environment!
Mrs. Coach Brown got Teacher of the Year at her high school this year. She got it because she’s really damn good at teaching and things. She’s far better than I am. She’s earned it many times over.
Of course, leave it to the idiots at the Willits News to report on district Teachers of the Year like this;
An article that big and you can’t even list the names? Guess if isn’t weed or chaos, it isn’t newsworthy. Trash.
Mid-May also brings Senior realization mode. Attitudes are starting to soften and shift as some of the students start to realize that their life is about to make a substantial shift elsewhere. It’s not that they don’t want to leave, it’s that they are a tad fearful that the routine is gone, a tad sad that their cliques will be evaporated, and a tad apprehensive about what is coming. Lots of listening and lots of smiles will be coming in the next few weeks.
Thursday, May 07, 2015
It always starts with an Op-Ed piece in the critically acclaimed Ukiah Daily Journal. In the past it has been about school start times, funding obligations, labor issues, and the athletic program. Now, homework. Yep, this is often how school board members peak the interest of community members on educational topics.
Megan Van Sant is a school board member who has written the latest piece on the value of homework called “Does Homework Matter?”
“Ahh… Homework. When I mentioned that I was considering writing a column about homework, the response from others was sharp and immediate. “Ugh,” said the first parent I spoke to. “I hate homework.” Without fail, every person I talked to about homework responded with a similar statement. Homework, it seems, is universally deplored.”
Not that teachers love homework but it seems Ms. Van Sant forgot to talk to educators about the unholy act of assigning work outside of class.
What’s interesting about the issue of homework is that A) nobody can agree on what “homework” actually is, and B) much of the argument revolves around the issue of the child feeling “stressed” or “uncomfortable.” For example, Van Sant grabs this quote form Kohn’s book about homework;
“A peek into many family homes easily reveals the negative effects of homework. They include children’s “frustration and exhaustion, lack of time for other activities, and possible loss of interest in learning. Many parents lament the impact of homework on their relationship with their children; they may also resent having to play the role of enforcer and worry that they will be criticized either for not being involved enough with the homework or for becoming too involved.”
Oh no! Do you mean that the soul crushing teacher has assigned something that actually requires the kid to do something they, *gasp*, DON’T WANT TO DO?! The humanity! The horror! God forbid a parent play the role of enforcer for the sake of becoming involved in a child’s education. This “don’t make my child uncomfortable because it is mean” attitude has permeated our society and turned it into the temple of thy childrens’ maximum comfort.
“Maybe, I thought, this misery and family conflict is warranted because of the academic benefits of homework. But delving into the research on homework was a surprise. It turns out that the positive effects of homework are largely mythical.”
It actually turns out that this is statement that is supported by Alfie Kohn is actually incorrect, and like most things regarding a child’s education, insanely tough to put towards causation. Kohn hates everything standardized test, praise, homework, God, the Constitution, street food tacos, and everything else that could possibly get his name in the Edu-Reform circles. He says that “time-on-task” is basically pointless when it comes to intellectual learning. Skill? Fine. Learning? No. As stated in the above report, it’s basically impossible to make the statement that homework is bad because, A) the students are different, B) the homework is different, and C) there are multiple variables in education that also correlate to student performance. Hell, most reports can’t come to any concrete conclusion on how many hours per week. Some reports say as much as four hours per night. I will go on record and say that this is pretty much a bald faced lie. Do I have students that will do this much homework a night? Yes. Are they a majority? Not even close. In fact I would say less than 10% easy. Economists would say that when you ask a student “how many hours a night do you work on homework”, there is a good chance that the data might lie to you a wee bit.
“The conventional wisdom about homework, even if flawed, is deeply ingrained in the American educational system. Nevertheless, within our own families, we get to create our own institutions. If you feel conflicted about homework, I encourage you to question your intrinsically held beliefs and trust your instincts. Try not to ruin your family life over homework. It’s just not worth it.”
And now we get the real problem with homework; people don’t like it. Check out this report by the Brookings Institute that pretty much throws out the overworked teen narrative and explains that most of the chatter is coming from a small group of parents that don’t like to see Johnny do something Johnny doesn’t want to do. In fact, the data seems to support that more high school students have LESS homework than past decades because the curriculum has turned towards the classroom and out of homes. Surprised? I’m not.
I teach Seniors. I assign homework. It is not difficult at all and is used to reinforce lessons we did in class that day or recently. Do I find it valuable? I wouldn’t assign it if I didn’t see it as valuable. I don’t think that homework is unreasonable or that the demand that it be done on-time is unreasonable. What I do think is that kids have not been taught to make choices and not been taught to manage time. And this attack on homework is the gross overreaction too that.